IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering

42.1k citations
2.5k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering

2.2k papers receiving 41.3k citations

Peers

IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering
Comparison fields: 5 of 202
  • Computer Networks and Communications 19.4k
  • Artificial Intelligence 11.3k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 4.1k
  • Information Systems 6.8k
  • Control and Systems Engineering 5.8k
Replace Science China Information Sciences with:
Science China Information Sciences China
Complexity China
Computing in Science & Engineering United States
Computing Germany
IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica China
Mathematical and Computer Modelling United States
IEEE Intelligent Systems United States
Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience China
Neural Processing Letters China
IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems China
IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering relative to Science China Information Sciences China Science China Information Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Science China Information Sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering more than expected).

Fields of papers published in IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering.

About IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering

The 2.5k papers published in IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering in the last decades have received a total of 42.1k indexed citations . Papers published in IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering usually cover Computer Networks and Communications (1.3k papers), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (400 papers), Computational Mathematics (12 papers), Artificial Intelligence (666 papers) and Information Systems (329 papers) specifically the topics of Complex Network Analysis Techniques (361 papers), Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems (290 papers), IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (246 papers), Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (214 papers), Neural Networks Stability and Synchronization (188 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (181 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (173 papers) and Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (161 papers). The most active scholars publishing in IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering are Tingwen Huang, Zhipeng Cai, Xu Zheng, Naixue N. Xiong, Jinde Cao, Gautam Srivastava, Mohsen Guizani, Choon Ki Ahn, Thippa Reddy Gadekallu and Houbing Herbert Song.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact