Theology and Sexuality

367 papers and 887 indexed citations i.

About

The 367 papers published in Theology and Sexuality in the last decades have received a total of 887 indexed citations. Papers published in Theology and Sexuality usually cover Sociology and Political Science (203 papers), Religious studies (82 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (53 papers) specifically the topics of Theological Perspectives and Practices (65 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (50 papers) and LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (40 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Theology and Sexuality are Susannah Cornwall, Andrew Kam-Tuck Yip, Sharyn Graham Davies, Gerard Loughlin, S. Groß, Beth R. Crisp, John Blevins, Ken Stone, Asifa Siraj and Janet Martin Soskice.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Theology and Sexuality

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Theology and Sexuality. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Theology and Sexuality.

Countries where authors publish in Theology and Sexuality

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Theology and Sexuality. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Theology and Sexuality with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theology and Sexuality more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025