˜The œMississippi quarterly

202 papers and 170 indexed citations i.

About

The 202 papers published in ˜The œMississippi quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 170 indexed citations. Papers published in ˜The œMississippi quarterly usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (94 papers), Sociology and Political Science (28 papers) and History (24 papers) specifically the topics of American and British Literature Analysis (39 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (22 papers) and Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (14 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ˜The œMississippi quarterly are Russ Castronovo, Peter Schmidt, Michael Honey, Michael Lackey, David Davis, Nancy M. Dixon, Danielle Fuller, Maciej Eder, Sarita Echavez See and Thomas Smith.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in ˜The œMississippi quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ˜The œMississippi quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ˜The œMississippi quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in ˜The œMississippi quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ˜The œMississippi quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ˜The œMississippi quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ˜The œMississippi quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025