Terapevticheskii arkhiv

1.9k papers and 5.4k indexed citations

About

The 1.9k papers published in Terapevticheskii arkhiv in the last decades have received a total of 5.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Terapevticheskii arkhiv usually cover Epidemiology (424 papers), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (382 papers) and Surgery (338 papers) specifically the topics of Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (120 papers), Healthcare Systems and Public Health (106 papers) and Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (80 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Terapevticheskii arkhiv are Upkar Varshney, И. В. Маев, Д. Н. Андреев, И Е Чазова, S. А. Boytsov, В. А. Парфенов, В. А. Головачева, Е. Л. Насонов, T. V. Martynyuk and А И Парфенов.

In The Last Decade

Terapevticheskii arkhiv

1.4k papers receiving 4.8k citations

Fields of papers published in Terapevticheskii arkhiv

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Terapevticheskii arkhiv. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Terapevticheskii arkhiv.

Countries where authors publish in Terapevticheskii arkhiv

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Terapevticheskii arkhiv. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Terapevticheskii arkhiv with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Terapevticheskii arkhiv more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026