Surgical Technology Online

344 papers and 872 indexed citations i.

About

The 344 papers published in Surgical Technology Online in the last decades have received a total of 872 indexed citations. Papers published in Surgical Technology Online usually cover Surgery (258 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (63 papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (35 papers) specifically the topics of Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (77 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (58 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (53 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Surgical Technology Online are Mark Clatworthy, Rifat Latifi, Marc Possover, Kevin Woo, Michael A. Mont, Frank Willeke, Hytham S. Salem, Zhongming Chen, Abbas Smiley and Mahir Gachabayov.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Surgical Technology Online

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Surgical Technology Online. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Surgical Technology Online.

Countries where authors publish in Surgical Technology Online

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Surgical Technology Online. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Surgical Technology Online with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Surgical Technology Online more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025