Sociologia Ruralis

1.4k papers and 38.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Sociologia Ruralis in the last decades have received a total of 38.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Sociologia Ruralis usually cover General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (810 papers), Sociology and Political Science (390 papers) and Plant Science (315 papers) specifically the topics of Rural development and sustainability (643 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (286 papers) and Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (160 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sociologia Ruralis are Terry Marsden, Rob J.F. Burton, David Goodman, Mark Shucksmith, Christopher Ray, Michael Carolan, Julie Guthman, J.D. van der Ploeg, B.B. Bock and Susanne Padel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Sociologia Ruralis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Sociologia Ruralis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sociologia Ruralis.

Countries where authors publish in Sociologia Ruralis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sociologia Ruralis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sociologia Ruralis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sociologia Ruralis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025