Social Psychology

547 papers and 9.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 547 papers published in Social Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 9.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Social Psychology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (378 papers), Social Psychology (337 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (158 papers) specifically the topics of Social and Intergroup Psychology (322 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (180 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (127 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Psychology are Brian A. Nosek, Thomas F. Pettigrew, Daniël Lakens, Frank Asbrock, Andrea E. Abele, Klaus Rothermund, Zsuzsanna Kerekes, Tobias Greitemeyer, Hartmut Blank and Bernard Weiner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Social Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Social Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025