Advances in Skin & Wound Care

1.6k papers and 22.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Advances in Skin & Wound Care in the last decades have received a total of 22.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Advances in Skin & Wound Care usually cover Rehabilitation (717 papers), Occupational Therapy (699 papers) and Surgery (625 papers) specifically the topics of Wound Healing and Treatments (714 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (699 papers) and Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (431 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Advances in Skin & Wound Care are Barbara Braden, Elizabeth A. Ayello, R. Gary Sibbald, Kevin Woo, Diane Langemo, Robert Goldman, Cathy Thomas Hess, Richard Salcido, Mary Ellen Posthauer and Ira M. Herman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Advances in Skin & Wound Care

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Advances in Skin & Wound Care. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Advances in Skin & Wound Care.

Countries where authors publish in Advances in Skin & Wound Care

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Advances in Skin & Wound Care. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Advances in Skin & Wound Care with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Advances in Skin & Wound Care more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025