Neurologia medico-chirurgica

5.7k papers and 60.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.7k papers published in Neurologia medico-chirurgica in the last decades have received a total of 60.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Neurologia medico-chirurgica usually cover Neurology (3.0k papers), Surgery (1.5k papers) and Epidemiology (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (1.4k papers), Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (804 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (781 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neurologia medico-chirurgica are Teiji Tominaga, Kentaro Mori, Akira Yamaura, Minoru Maëda, Satoshi Kuroda, Takashi Komori, Susumu Miyamoto, Kiyohiro Houkin, Keiji Sano and Ryuichi Tanaka.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neurologia medico-chirurgica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neurologia medico-chirurgica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

Countries where authors publish in Neurologia medico-chirurgica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neurologia medico-chirurgica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neurologia medico-chirurgica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neurologia medico-chirurgica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025