Romanische Forschungen

260 papers and 451 indexed citations i.

About

The 260 papers published in Romanische Forschungen in the last decades have received a total of 451 indexed citations. Papers published in Romanische Forschungen usually cover Language and Linguistics (118 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (58 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (34 papers) specifically the topics of Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies (55 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (48 papers) and Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition (33 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Romanische Forschungen are Sebastián Neumeister, Timothy L. Face, Emanuela Cresti, Massimo Moneglia, John Holm, Franz Lebsanft, Martin Hummel, Alberto Hijazo‐Gascón, Iraide Ibarretxe‐Antuñano and Johannes Krämer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Romanische Forschungen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Romanische Forschungen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Romanische Forschungen.

Countries where authors publish in Romanische Forschungen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Romanische Forschungen. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Romanische Forschungen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Romanische Forschungen more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025