RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA

320 papers and 244 indexed citations i.

About

The 320 papers published in RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA in the last decades have received a total of 244 indexed citations. Papers published in RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA usually cover Philosophy (167 papers), Sociology and Political Science (61 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (49 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Philosophy and Thought (59 papers), Development of Political Thought in Early Modern Era (42 papers) and Italian Literature and Culture (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA are Hans Bernhard Schmid, Miguel Á. Granada, Cees Leijenhorst, Marco Sgarbi, Kinch Hoekstra, Franco Ferrari, Oskari Kuusela, Johann P. Sommerville, Cesare Vasoli and John Μ. Rist.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA.

Countries where authors publish in RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025