Countries where authors publish in Revue Forestière Française
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Revue Forestière Française. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Revue Forestière Française with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revue Forestière Française more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Revue Forestière Française
This network shows the impact of papers published in Revue Forestière Française. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Revue Forestière Française.
About Revue Forestière Française
The 2.1k papers published in Revue Forestière Française in the last decades have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Revue Forestière Française usually cover Forestry (268 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (456 papers), Insect Science (196 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (180 papers) and Plant Science (477 papers) specifically the topics of Agriculture and Rural Development Research (373 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (354 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (290 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (254 papers), Forest Management and Policy (179 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (156 papers), Forest ecology and management (146 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (137 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Revue Forestière Française are Claude Delatour, Gilbert Aussenac, Jean Garbaye, H. POLGE, F. Toutain, Henri Frochot, Michel Ducrey, M. Becker, François Le Tacon and M. Bonneau.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.