Revue des études byzantines

755 papers and 1.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 755 papers published in Revue des études byzantines in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Revue des études byzantines usually cover Classics (493 papers), Anthropology (280 papers) and Archeology (269 papers) specifically the topics of Byzantine Studies and History (471 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (196 papers) and Classical Antiquity Studies (175 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Revue des études byzantines are Paul Gautier, Jean Darrouzès, Albert Failler, Vitalien Laurent, Christopher Walter, Paul Lemerle, Venance Grumel, Jean-Claude Cheynet, Rodolphe Guilland and Nicolas Oikonomidès.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Revue des études byzantines

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Revue des études byzantines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Revue des études byzantines.

Countries where authors publish in Revue des études byzantines

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Revue des études byzantines. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Revue des études byzantines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revue des études byzantines more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025