Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials

625 papers and 6.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 625 papers published in Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials in the last decades have received a total of 6.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (118 papers), Surgery (109 papers) and Oncology (100 papers) specifically the topics of Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (29 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (27 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials are Ludovico Abenavoli, Vance W. Berger, Mark D. Berry, Andrew Knight, Alessandro Federico, C. Loguercio, Marcello Persico, Mario Masarone, Yukihide Iwamoto and Akio Sakamoto.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials.

Countries where authors publish in Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025