Review of Scientific Instruments

46.3k papers and 705.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 46.3k papers published in Review of Scientific Instruments in the last decades have received a total of 705.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Review of Scientific Instruments usually cover Electrical and Electronic Engineering (16.1k papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (14.6k papers) and Biomedical Engineering (9.6k papers) specifically the topics of Magnetic confinement fusion research (4.8k papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (4.6k papers) and Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (3.9k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of Scientific Instruments are S. Meiboom, Deepak Gill, John Bechhoefer, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Andrew M. Weiner, W. C. Wiley, David G. Cahill, David G. Cahill, Silas E. Gustafsson and John E. Sader.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Review of Scientific Instruments

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of Scientific Instruments. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of Scientific Instruments.

Countries where authors publish in Review of Scientific Instruments

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of Scientific Instruments. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of Scientific Instruments with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of Scientific Instruments more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025