Revista Estudos Feministas

1.4k papers and 7.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Revista Estudos Feministas in the last decades have received a total of 7.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Revista Estudos Feministas usually cover Gender Studies (660 papers), Sociology and Political Science (603 papers) and Philosophy (113 papers) specifically the topics of Gender, Sexuality, and Education (460 papers), Race, Identity, and Education in Brazil (119 papers) and Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies (95 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Revista Estudos Feministas are Kimberlé W. Crenshaw, María Lugones, Guacira Lopes Louro, Maria Luíza Heilborn, Daniel Welzer-Lang, Berenice Bento, James W. Messerschmidt, Robert W. Connell, Linda Nicholson and Luís Felipe Miguel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Revista Estudos Feministas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Revista Estudos Feministas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Revista Estudos Feministas.

Countries where authors publish in Revista Estudos Feministas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Revista Estudos Feministas. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Revista Estudos Feministas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revista Estudos Feministas more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025