Reformation and Renaissance Review

210 papers and 154 indexed citations i.

About

The 210 papers published in Reformation and Renaissance Review in the last decades have received a total of 154 indexed citations. Papers published in Reformation and Renaissance Review usually cover History (183 papers), Political Science and International Relations (76 papers) and Classics (40 papers) specifically the topics of Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (169 papers), Medieval Literature and History (28 papers) and Historical Influence and Diplomacy (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Reformation and Renaissance Review are Avihu Zakai, Paul Ayris, Richard A. Muller, Charlotte Methuen, Crawford Gribben, John E. Edwards, Judith Becker, Mark Garner, A. Gomes and Paul Shore.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Reformation and Renaissance Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Reformation and Renaissance Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reformation and Renaissance Review.

Countries where authors publish in Reformation and Renaissance Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reformation and Renaissance Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reformation and Renaissance Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reformation and Renaissance Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025