Quaestio Rossica

398 papers and 245 indexed citations i.

About

The 398 papers published in Quaestio Rossica in the last decades have received a total of 245 indexed citations. Papers published in Quaestio Rossica usually cover Political Science and International Relations (136 papers), Sociology and Political Science (121 papers) and Cultural Studies (59 papers) specifically the topics of Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication (52 papers), Soviet and Russian History (44 papers) and Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends (44 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quaestio Rossica are Gunnar Thorvaldsen, Andrey Epimakhov, Olga Kosheleva, Maureen Perrie, Roberto Cantoni, Arto Mustajoki, George Gilbert, Piotr Bednarz, Mikhail A. Kiselev and James White.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Quaestio Rossica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Quaestio Rossica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quaestio Rossica.

Countries where authors publish in Quaestio Rossica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quaestio Rossica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quaestio Rossica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quaestio Rossica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025