Psychological Injury and Law

461 papers and 4.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 461 papers published in Psychological Injury and Law in the last decades have received a total of 4.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychological Injury and Law usually cover Clinical Psychology (249 papers), Epidemiology (208 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (93 papers) specifically the topics of Traumatic Brain Injury Research (208 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (92 papers) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychological Injury and Law are Gerald Young, László A. Erdődi, Paul M. Richards, Harald Merckelbach, Luciano Giromini, Thomas Merten, Ronald M. Ruff, Martin Sellbom, Donald J. Viglione and Izabela Z. Schultz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychological Injury and Law

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychological Injury and Law. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychological Injury and Law.

Countries where authors publish in Psychological Injury and Law

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychological Injury and Law. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychological Injury and Law with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychological Injury and Law more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025