Prooftexts

310 papers and 358 indexed citations i.

About

The 310 papers published in Prooftexts in the last decades have received a total of 358 indexed citations. Papers published in Prooftexts usually cover Sociology and Political Science (188 papers), Religious studies (66 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (64 papers) specifically the topics of Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (133 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (62 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (38 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Prooftexts are Michael P. Kramer, David G. Roskies, D. Kramer, Sara R. Horowitz, Hana Wirth-Nesher, Don Seeman, Ishay Rosen-Zvi, Edward L. Greenstein, Steven G. Kellman and M.D. Mann.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Prooftexts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Prooftexts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Prooftexts.

Countries where authors publish in Prooftexts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Prooftexts. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Prooftexts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Prooftexts more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025