Полис Политические исследования

766 papers and 987 indexed citations i.

About

The 766 papers published in Полис Политические исследования in the last decades have received a total of 987 indexed citations. Papers published in Полис Политические исследования usually cover Political Science and International Relations (215 papers), Sociology and Political Science (200 papers) and Demography (38 papers) specifically the topics of Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia (125 papers), Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation (78 papers) and Global Political and Economic Relations (49 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Полис Политические исследования are Alexander Lukin, Olga Malinova, Polina M. Kozyreva, Alexei Arbatov, Владимир Гельман, Peter Rutland, Денис Стукал, Valery Konyshev, Alexander Petrov and Thomas Graham.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Полис Политические исследования

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Полис Политические исследования. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Полис Политические исследования.

Countries where authors publish in Полис Политические исследования

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Полис Политические исследования. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Полис Политические исследования with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Полис Политические исследования more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025