Journal of Political Marketing

441 papers and 4.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 441 papers published in Journal of Political Marketing in the last decades have received a total of 4.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Political Marketing usually cover Communication (254 papers), Sociology and Political Science (184 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (177 papers) specifically the topics of Social Media and Politics (215 papers), Media Studies and Communication (134 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (132 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Political Marketing are Stephan C. Henneberg, Terri L. Towner, Gareth Smith, Alessandro Nai, Jesper Strömbäck, Derrick L. Cogburn, Caroline Lego Muñoz, Helmut Schneider, Andrzej Fałkowski and Bruce I. Newman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Political Marketing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Political Marketing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Political Marketing.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Political Marketing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Political Marketing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Political Marketing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Political Marketing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025