Plasma Medicine

273 papers and 2.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 273 papers published in Plasma Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 2.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Plasma Medicine usually cover Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (188 papers), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (73 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (37 papers) specifically the topics of Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (184 papers), Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (43 papers) and Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Plasma Medicine are Klaus‐Dieter Weltmann, Masaaki Mizuno, Fumitaka Kikkawa, Masaru Hori, Hiromasa Tanaka, Alexander A. Fridman, Kae Nakamura, Hiroaki Kajiyama, Hiroyuki Kano and Kenji Ishikawa.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Plasma Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Plasma Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Plasma Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Plasma Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Plasma Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Plasma Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Plasma Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025