Plant protection quarterly

510 papers and 4.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 510 papers published in Plant protection quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 4.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Plant protection quarterly usually cover Plant Science (287 papers), Insect Science (268 papers) and Ecology (99 papers) specifically the topics of Biological Control of Invasive Species (216 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (81 papers) and Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (76 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Plant protection quarterly are John Busby, F. D. Panetta, Roger Cousens, Rachel McFadyen, D. T. Briese, George N. Batianoff, Paul Downey, Don Butler, J. M. B. Smith and S. M. Timmins.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Plant protection quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Plant protection quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Plant protection quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Plant protection quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Plant protection quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Plant protection quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Plant protection quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025