Physics Reports

2.9k papers and 469.3k indexed citations

About

The 2.9k papers published in Physics Reports in the last decades have received a total of 469.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Physics Reports usually cover Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.1k papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.1k papers) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (565 papers) specifically the topics of Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (497 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (461 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (281 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Physics Reports are Santo Fortunato, Kenneth G. Wilson, J. Klafter, Ralf Metzler, B. V. Chirikov, Stefano Boccaletti, Hans Peter Nilles, Howard E. Haber, Viatcheslav Mukhanov and M. S. Dresselhaus.

In The Last Decade

Physics Reports

2.8k papers receiving 451.9k citations

Fields of papers published in Physics Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Physics Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Physics Reports.

Countries where authors publish in Physics Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Physics Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Physics Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physics Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026