Pacific Coast Philology

319 papers and 309 indexed citations i.

About

The 319 papers published in Pacific Coast Philology in the last decades have received a total of 309 indexed citations. Papers published in Pacific Coast Philology usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (101 papers), Sociology and Political Science (43 papers) and Philosophy (41 papers) specifically the topics of Medieval Literature and History (15 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (14 papers) and Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pacific Coast Philology are Joseph Harris, Mary Frances Wack, Yvonne Yarbro‐Bejarano, Paul Douglass, Cynthia Merrill, Patricia Merivale, Teresa de Lauretis, Sheila K. Johnson, Frederick Burwick and Donna Lanclos.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pacific Coast Philology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pacific Coast Philology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pacific Coast Philology.

Countries where authors publish in Pacific Coast Philology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pacific Coast Philology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pacific Coast Philology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pacific Coast Philology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025