Countries where authors publish in Oriental Insects
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Oriental Insects. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Oriental Insects with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oriental Insects more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Oriental Insects. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Oriental Insects.
About Oriental Insects
The 1.5k papers published in Oriental Insects in the last decades have received a total of 8.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Oriental Insects usually cover Insect Science (788 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.1k papers), Genetics (418 papers), Paleontology (79 papers) and Plant Science (374 papers) specifically the topics of Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (541 papers), Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny (368 papers), Plant and animal studies (303 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (288 papers), Fossil Insects in Amber (152 papers), Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution (142 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (131 papers) and Diptera species taxonomy and behavior (123 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Oriental Insects are V.K. Gupta, Mohammad Hayat, Alexandr P. Rasnitsyn, Louis M. Roth, J. S. Bhatti, Tim R. New, Janakiraman Poorani, T. N. Ananthakrishnan, Vinod K. Gupta and S. Chakrabarti.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.