Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie

1.2k papers and 8.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie in the last decades have received a total of 8.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie usually cover Surgery (1.1k papers), Epidemiology (333 papers) and Rehabilitation (265 papers) specifically the topics of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (388 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (228 papers) and Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (206 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie are H. Zwipp, J. Harms, Michael C. Schubert, Thomas Hoogland, Christian Krettek, Theddy Slongo, Dezsö Jeszenszky, Wolf Petersen, Andreas B. Imhoff and Axel Gänsslen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie.

Countries where authors publish in Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025