NTT technical review

1.2k papers and 1.8k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.2k papers published in NTT technical review in the last decades have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations. Papers published in NTT technical review usually cover Electrical and Electronic Engineering (298 papers), Computer Networks and Communications (160 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (115 papers) specifically the topics of Optical Network Technologies (78 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (77 papers) and Advanced Photonic Communication Systems (74 papers). The most active scholars publishing in NTT technical review are Shôgo Yagi, Makoto Kasu, Masaaki Honda, Masaya Notomi, Yoshitaka Taniyasu, Naoya Kukutsu, Yutaka Miyamoto, Yuichi Kado, Koichiro Nakamura and Toshikazu Sakano.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in NTT technical review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in NTT technical review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in NTT technical review.

Countries where authors publish in NTT technical review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in NTT technical review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in NTT technical review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NTT technical review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026