Mineralogy and Petrology

1.8k papers and 38.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Mineralogy and Petrology in the last decades have received a total of 38.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Mineralogy and Petrology usually cover Geophysics (1.4k papers), Artificial Intelligence (528 papers) and Geochemistry and Petrology (429 papers) specifically the topics of Geological and Geochemical Analysis (1.4k papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (612 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (603 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Mineralogy and Petrology are Nobuyuki Morimoto, Keith Bell, Zdeněk Johan, N. M. S. Rock, Benedetto De Vivo, Ilmari Haapala, D. H. Green, Michael Bau, Peter M�ller and Harvey E. Belkin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Mineralogy and Petrology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Mineralogy and Petrology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Mineralogy and Petrology.

Countries where authors publish in Mineralogy and Petrology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Mineralogy and Petrology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Mineralogy and Petrology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mineralogy and Petrology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025