Marriage & Family Review

1.3k papers and 19.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Marriage & Family Review in the last decades have received a total of 19.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Marriage & Family Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (623 papers), Demography (432 papers) and Social Psychology (312 papers) specifically the topics of Family Dynamics and Relationships (391 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (279 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (245 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Marriage & Family Review are Michael E. Lamb, Hamilton I. McCubbin, Joän M. Patterson, William H. Jeynes, Martin Pinquart, Jean E. Veevers, Joyce L. Epstein, Ruth Katz, Yoav Lavee and Ross D. Parke.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Marriage & Family Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Marriage & Family Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Marriage & Family Review.

Countries where authors publish in Marriage & Family Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Marriage & Family Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Marriage & Family Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marriage & Family Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025