The Law and Development Review

241 papers and 720 indexed citations i.

About

The 241 papers published in The Law and Development Review in the last decades have received a total of 720 indexed citations. Papers published in The Law and Development Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (94 papers), Political Science and International Relations (74 papers) and Law (56 papers) specifically the topics of Human Rights and Development (48 papers), International Development and Aid (31 papers) and World Trade Organization Law (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Law and Development Review are Andreas Neef, Yong‐Shik Lee, Claudia R. Williamson, Peter T. Leeson, Michael J. Trebilcock, Bryan Mercurio, Art Carden, Liz Alden Wily, Wouter Vandenhole and Julien Chaisse.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Law and Development Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Law and Development Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Law and Development Review.

Countries where authors publish in The Law and Development Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Law and Development Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Law and Development Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Law and Development Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025