Latin American theatre review

528 papers and 383 indexed citations i.

About

The 528 papers published in Latin American theatre review in the last decades have received a total of 383 indexed citations. Papers published in Latin American theatre review usually cover Clinical Psychology (198 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (186 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (146 papers) specifically the topics of Historical and Modern Theater Studies (197 papers), Spanish Literature and Culture Studies (83 papers) and Literary and Cultural Studies (69 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Latin American theatre review are Jorge Huerta, Frank Dauster, Robert J. Morris, Augusto Boal, Ernesto Barrera, David William Foster, John Dowling, Vicky Unruh, Gerald M. Moser and Diana Taylor.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Latin American theatre review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Latin American theatre review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Latin American theatre review.

Countries where authors publish in Latin American theatre review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Latin American theatre review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Latin American theatre review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Latin American theatre review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025