Journal of Scheduling

979 papers and 20.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 979 papers published in Journal of Scheduling in the last decades have received a total of 20.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Scheduling usually cover Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (805 papers), Computer Networks and Communications (519 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (230 papers) specifically the topics of Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (685 papers), Optimization and Search Problems (419 papers) and Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization (255 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Scheduling are Erik Demeulemeester, Djamila Ouelhadj, Sanja Petrović, Edmund Burke, Monaldo Mastrolilli, Patrick De Causmaecker, Jeffrey W. Herrmann, Mario Vanhoucke, Edward M.H. Lin and Guilherme Ernani Vieira.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Scheduling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Scheduling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Scheduling.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Scheduling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Scheduling. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Scheduling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Scheduling more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025