Journal of Jesuit Studies

226 papers and 179 indexed citations i.

About

The 226 papers published in Journal of Jesuit Studies in the last decades have received a total of 179 indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Jesuit Studies usually cover History (113 papers), Political Science and International Relations (56 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (52 papers) specifically the topics of Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (73 papers), Early Modern Women Writers (35 papers) and Historical Influence and Diplomacy (21 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Jesuit Studies are Paul F. Grendler, Andrés Iglesias, Adriano Prosperi, Adam Rothman, John W. O’Malley, S. Ignacimuthu, Markus Friedrich, John T. McGreevy, Robert H. Jackson and Jeffrey L. Gould.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Jesuit Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Jesuit Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Jesuit Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Jesuit Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Jesuit Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Jesuit Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Jesuit Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025