Journal of ecumenical studies

414 papers and 431 indexed citations i.

About

The 414 papers published in Journal of ecumenical studies in the last decades have received a total of 431 indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of ecumenical studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (257 papers), Religious studies (156 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (101 papers) specifically the topics of Religion and Society Interactions (106 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (63 papers) and Transformation of Global Christianity since 1945 (62 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of ecumenical studies are David Emmanuel Singh, Miroslav Volf, Leonard Swidler, Paul F. Knitter, E. James Baesler, Asma Afsaruddin, Joseph V. Montville, Martin S. Jaffee, Michael Barnes and Jo Thori Lind.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of ecumenical studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of ecumenical studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of ecumenical studies.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of ecumenical studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of ecumenical studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of ecumenical studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of ecumenical studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025