Countries where authors publish in Journal of American Folklore
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of American Folklore. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of American Folklore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of American Folklore more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of American Folklore
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of American Folklore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of American Folklore.
About Journal of American Folklore
The 3.7k papers published in Journal of American Folklore in the last decades have received a total of 39.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of American Folklore usually cover Music (391 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (1.0k papers), Anthropology (407 papers), Cultural Studies (272 papers) and Museology (107 papers) specifically the topics of Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (870 papers), Music History and Culture (281 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (144 papers), Culinary Culture and Tourism (129 papers), Philippine History and Culture (115 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (105 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (98 papers) and Archaeology and Natural History (97 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of American Folklore are Dell H. Hymes, Claude Lévi‐Strauss, Alan Dundes, Roger D. Abrahams, William Bascom, Gary Alan Fine, Wade Baskin, Albert Séchehaye, Ferdinand de Saussure and Charles Bally.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.