Countries where authors publish in JAAD Case Reports
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JAAD Case Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JAAD Case Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JAAD Case Reports more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in JAAD Case Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JAAD Case Reports.
About JAAD Case Reports
The 3.1k papers published in JAAD Case Reports in the last decades have received a total of 13.7k indexed citations . Papers published in JAAD Case Reports usually cover Dermatology (1.4k papers), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (762 papers), Rheumatology (587 papers), Periodontics (145 papers) and Epidemiology (943 papers) specifically the topics of Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases (489 papers), Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (368 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (257 papers), Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders (256 papers), Urticaria and Related Conditions (228 papers), Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions (209 papers), Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes (189 papers) and Dermatology and Skin Diseases (187 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JAAD Case Reports are J. Levitt, William Damsky, Brett King, David James Najarian, Jeff Donovan, Orit Markowitz, Brittany G. Craiglow, Misha Rosenbach, Matthew D. Vesely and Rodney Sinclair.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.