Countries where authors publish in JAAD Case Reports
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JAAD Case Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JAAD Case Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JAAD Case Reports more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in JAAD Case Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JAAD Case Reports.
About JAAD Case Reports
The 3.3k papers published in JAAD Case Reports in the last decades have received a total of 15.3k indexed citations . Papers published in JAAD Case Reports usually cover Dermatology (1.4k papers), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (792 papers), Rheumatology (602 papers), Periodontics (157 papers) and Epidemiology (986 papers) specifically the topics of Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases (508 papers), Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (379 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (278 papers), Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders (266 papers), Urticaria and Related Conditions (231 papers), Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions (212 papers), Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (196 papers) and Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes (194 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JAAD Case Reports are Jacob Oren Levitt, William Damsky, Brett King, Jeff Donovan, David James Najarian, Matthew D. Vesely, Brittany G. Craiglow, Misha A. Rosenbach, Rodney Daniel Sinclair and Kiran Motaparthi.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.