Infection Prevention in Practice

302 papers and 1.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 302 papers published in Infection Prevention in Practice in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Infection Prevention in Practice usually cover Infectious Diseases (141 papers), Epidemiology (67 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (66 papers) specifically the topics of Infection Control in Healthcare (67 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (58 papers) and Infection Control and Ventilation (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Infection Prevention in Practice are Günter Kampf, Mansour Tobaiqy, Mohammad Azhar Kamal, Nawal Helmi, Blair Merrick, Debbie L. Shawcross, Simon Goldenberg, Ben Forbes, Nur Masirah M. Zain and Jonathan Lellouche.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Infection Prevention in Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Infection Prevention in Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Infection Prevention in Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Infection Prevention in Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Infection Prevention in Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Infection Prevention in Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Infection Prevention in Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025