Invertebrate Systematics

1.2k papers and 19.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Invertebrate Systematics in the last decades have received a total of 19.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Invertebrate Systematics usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (628 papers), Ecology (463 papers) and Genetics (353 papers) specifically the topics of Marine Biology and Ecology Research (239 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (194 papers) and Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution (143 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Invertebrate Systematics are Mark S. Harvey, Gonzalo Giribet, Andrew D. Austin, William F. Humphreys, Steven J. Cooper, Ian Beveridge, R. Domrow, JF Lawrence, Jonas J. Astrin and John F. Lawrence.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Invertebrate Systematics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Invertebrate Systematics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Invertebrate Systematics.

Countries where authors publish in Invertebrate Systematics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Invertebrate Systematics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Invertebrate Systematics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Invertebrate Systematics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025