Information Sciences

16.8k papers and 489.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 16.8k papers published in Information Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 489.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Information Sciences usually cover Artificial Intelligence (8.2k papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (4.1k papers) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (3.0k papers) specifically the topics of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (1.9k papers), Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (1.8k papers) and Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research (1.1k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Information Sciences are Lotfi A. Zadeh, L. A. Zadeh, Yiyu Yao, Zeshui Xu, Ronald R. Yager, Francisco Herrera, Shyi‐Ming Chen, Hossein Nezamabadi‐pour, William Zhu and Saeı̈d Saryazdi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Information Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Information Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Information Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Information Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Information Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Information Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Information Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025