Countries where authors publish in Chinese Physics C
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chinese Physics C. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chinese Physics C with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Physics C more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Chinese Physics C. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chinese Physics C.
About Chinese Physics C
The 3.2k papers published in Chinese Physics C in the last decades have received a total of 24.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Chinese Physics C usually cover Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2.3k papers), Radiation (552 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysics (566 papers), Aerospace Engineering (550 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (625 papers) specifically the topics of Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (952 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (931 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (710 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (619 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (361 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (359 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (348 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (343 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chinese Physics C are Meng Wang, Filip Kondev, G. Audi, S. Naimi, Wenjia Huang, Ronggang Ping, B. Pfeiffer, M. MacCormick, X. Xu and A.H. Wapstra.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.