Geographica Helvetica

986 papers and 5.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 986 papers published in Geographica Helvetica in the last decades have received a total of 5.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Geographica Helvetica usually cover Sociology and Political Science (297 papers), Political Science and International Relations (134 papers) and Geography, Planning and Development (120 papers) specifically the topics of Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies (112 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (59 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (55 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Geographica Helvetica are Ola Söderström, Nickolas Zouros, Emmanuel Reynard, Cristian Scapozza, Enrique Serrano, Purificación Ruiz Flaño, B. Messerli, L. Kozlik, G. Dalla Fontana and Paulo Pereira.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Geographica Helvetica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Geographica Helvetica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Geographica Helvetica.

Countries where authors publish in Geographica Helvetica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Geographica Helvetica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Geographica Helvetica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geographica Helvetica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025