Filosofia Unisinos

201 papers and 197 indexed citations i.

About

The 201 papers published in Filosofia Unisinos in the last decades have received a total of 197 indexed citations. Papers published in Filosofia Unisinos usually cover Philosophy (75 papers), Sociology and Political Science (39 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (23 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Philosophy and Thought (17 papers), Psychology and Mental Health (12 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (10 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Filosofia Unisinos are Ruth Garrett Millikan, John R. Searle, Seungbae Park, Robert N. McCauley, Hugh Lacey, Teresa Marques, Patrícia Rivera, Peter Singer, Lisa Bortolotti and Akihiko Morita.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Filosofia Unisinos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Filosofia Unisinos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Filosofia Unisinos.

Countries where authors publish in Filosofia Unisinos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Filosofia Unisinos. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Filosofia Unisinos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Filosofia Unisinos more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025