European Romantic Review

741 papers and 849 indexed citations i.

About

The 741 papers published in European Romantic Review in the last decades have received a total of 849 indexed citations. Papers published in European Romantic Review usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (310 papers), History (171 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (123 papers) specifically the topics of Literature: history, themes, analysis (128 papers), Travel Writing and Literature (73 papers) and Historical Art and Culture Studies (48 papers). The most active scholars publishing in European Romantic Review are Tilottama Rajan, Daniel Robinson, Andrew M. Stauffer, Susan J. Wolfson, Anne K. Mellor, Rei Terada, David A. Simpson, Thomas Pfau, Anne D. Wallace and Jeffrey N. Cox.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in European Romantic Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in European Romantic Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in European Romantic Review.

Countries where authors publish in European Romantic Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in European Romantic Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in European Romantic Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites European Romantic Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025