Entomologia Generalis

1.2k papers and 10.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Entomologia Generalis in the last decades have received a total of 10.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Entomologia Generalis usually cover Insect Science (689 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (609 papers) and Genetics (346 papers) specifically the topics of Plant and animal studies (280 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (277 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (259 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Entomologia Generalis are Lars Chittka, Nicolas Desneux, Giovanni Benelli, Nigel E. Raine, Alfred Buschinger, Xiwu Gao, R. A. Crowson, Adrian G. Dyer, Dunlun Song and Donato Romano.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Entomologia Generalis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Entomologia Generalis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Entomologia Generalis.

Countries where authors publish in Entomologia Generalis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Entomologia Generalis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Entomologia Generalis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Entomologia Generalis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025