Countries where authors publish in Energy Geoscience
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Energy Geoscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Energy Geoscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Energy Geoscience more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Energy Geoscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Energy Geoscience.
About Energy Geoscience
The 382 papers published in Energy Geoscience in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Energy Geoscience usually cover Geology (71 papers), Mechanics of Materials (248 papers), Ocean Engineering (138 papers), Geophysics (83 papers) and Mechanical Engineering (147 papers) specifically the topics of Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (236 papers), Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (136 papers), Geological and Geophysical Studies (52 papers), Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques (51 papers), Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (49 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (47 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (42 papers) and Drilling and Well Engineering (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Energy Geoscience are Juciano Gasparotto, Kátia da Boit Martinello, Amy Wolfe, Robert B. Finkelman, Michael Hendryx, M. Santosh, Yongsheng Ma, Abouzar Mirzaei‐Paiaman, Glen T. Nwaila and Zhaojie Xue.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.