This map shows the geographic impact of research published in e-Polymers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in e-Polymers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites e-Polymers more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in e-Polymers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in e-Polymers.
About e-Polymers
The 1.8k papers published in e-Polymers in the last decades have received a total of 16.3k indexed citations . Papers published in e-Polymers usually cover Polymers and Plastics (927 papers), Biomaterials (488 papers), Process Chemistry and Technology (60 papers), Molecular Medicine (79 papers) and Organic Chemistry (374 papers) specifically the topics of biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (304 papers), Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties (301 papers), Polymer crystallization and properties (244 papers), Synthesis and properties of polymers (210 papers), Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (188 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (146 papers), Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry (131 papers) and Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (128 papers). The most active scholars publishing in e-Polymers are Mehran Alavi, Heino Finkelmann, Pieter Gijsman, Christopher J. Wallis, Margot N. Wenzel, Gavin Hill, Bernhard Schartel, Sukhwinder K. Bhullar, Gaigai Duan and Andreas Greiner.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.