Ecology Of Freshwater Fish

1.6k papers and 32.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Ecology Of Freshwater Fish in the last decades have received a total of 32.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Ecology Of Freshwater Fish usually cover Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.5k papers), Ecology (872 papers) and Aquatic Science (678 papers) specifically the topics of Fish Ecology and Management Studies (1.5k papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (619 papers) and Marine and fisheries research (382 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ecology Of Freshwater Fish are Per‐Arne Amundsen, J. Brian Dempson, Bror Jönsson, Anders Klemetsen, Gary D. Grossman, Nina Jönsson, Erik Lykke Mortensen, Cristina Cox Fernandes, Michael O’Connell and Jason B. Dunham.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ecology Of Freshwater Fish

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ecology Of Freshwater Fish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ecology Of Freshwater Fish.

Countries where authors publish in Ecology Of Freshwater Fish

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ecology Of Freshwater Fish. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ecology Of Freshwater Fish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ecology Of Freshwater Fish more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025