Early China

326 papers and 965 indexed citations i.

About

The 326 papers published in Early China in the last decades have received a total of 965 indexed citations. Papers published in Early China usually cover Sociology and Political Science (255 papers), Cultural Studies (68 papers) and Anthropology (38 papers) specifically the topics of Chinese history and philosophy (253 papers), Japanese History and Culture (68 papers) and China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Early China are David W. Pankenier, Lothar von Falkenhausen, Edward L. Shaughnessy, Wu Hung, Liu Li, Robert Thorp, Robin D.S. Yates, Michael Nylan, Donald Harper and David N. Keightley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Early China

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Early China. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Early China.

Countries where authors publish in Early China

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Early China. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Early China with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Early China more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025